433 research outputs found
Separating regular languages with two quantifier alternations
We investigate a famous decision problem in automata theory: separation.
Given a class of language C, the separation problem for C takes as input two
regular languages and asks whether there exists a third one which belongs to C,
includes the first one and is disjoint from the second. Typically, obtaining an
algorithm for separation yields a deep understanding of the investigated class
C. This explains why a lot of effort has been devoted to finding algorithms for
the most prominent classes.
Here, we are interested in classes within concatenation hierarchies. Such
hierarchies are built using a generic construction process: one starts from an
initial class called the basis and builds new levels by applying generic
operations. The most famous one, the dot-depth hierarchy of Brzozowski and
Cohen, classifies the languages definable in first-order logic. Moreover, it
was shown by Thomas that it corresponds to the quantifier alternation hierarchy
of first-order logic: each level in the dot-depth corresponds to the languages
that can be defined with a prescribed number of quantifier blocks. Finding
separation algorithms for all levels in this hierarchy is among the most famous
open problems in automata theory.
Our main theorem is generic: we show that separation is decidable for the
level 3/2 of any concatenation hierarchy whose basis is finite. Furthermore, in
the special case of the dot-depth, we push this result to the level 5/2. In
logical terms, this solves separation for : first-order sentences
having at most three quantifier blocks starting with an existential one
Separating Regular Languages with First-Order Logic
Given two languages, a separator is a third language that contains the first
one and is disjoint from the second one. We investigate the following decision
problem: given two regular input languages of finite words, decide whether
there exists a first-order definable separator. We prove that in order to
answer this question, sufficient information can be extracted from semigroups
recognizing the input languages, using a fixpoint computation. This yields an
EXPTIME algorithm for checking first-order separability. Moreover, the
correctness proof of this algorithm yields a stronger result, namely a
description of a possible separator. Finally, we generalize this technique to
answer the same question for regular languages of infinite words
Deciding definability in FO2(<h,<v) on trees
We provide a decidable characterization of regular forest languages definable
in FO2(<h,<v). By FO2(<h,<v) we refer to the two variable fragment of first
order logic built from the descendant relation and the following sibling
relation. In terms of expressive power it corresponds to a fragment of the
navigational core of XPath that contains modalities for going up to some
ancestor, down to some descendant, left to some preceding sibling, and right to
some following sibling. We also show that our techniques can be applied to
other two variable first-order logics having exactly the same vertical
modalities as FO2(<h,<v) but having different horizontal modalities
The Covering Problem
An important endeavor in computer science is to understand the expressive
power of logical formalisms over discrete structures, such as words. Naturally,
"understanding" is not a mathematical notion. This investigation requires
therefore a concrete objective to capture this understanding. In the
literature, the standard choice for this objective is the membership problem,
whose aim is to find a procedure deciding whether an input regular language can
be defined in the logic under investigation. This approach was cemented as the
right one by the seminal work of Sch\"utzenberger, McNaughton and Papert on
first-order logic and has been in use since then. However, membership questions
are hard: for several important fragments, researchers have failed in this
endeavor despite decades of investigation. In view of recent results on one of
the most famous open questions, namely the quantifier alternation hierarchy of
first-order logic, an explanation may be that membership is too restrictive as
a setting. These new results were indeed obtained by considering more general
problems than membership, taking advantage of the increased flexibility of the
enriched mathematical setting. This opens a promising research avenue and
efforts have been devoted at identifying and solving such problems for natural
fragments. Until now however, these problems have been ad hoc, most fragments
relying on a specific one. A unique new problem replacing membership as the
right one is still missing. The main contribution of this paper is a suitable
candidate to play this role: the Covering Problem. We motivate this problem
with 3 arguments. First, it admits an elementary set theoretic formulation,
similar to membership. Second, we are able to reexplain or generalize all known
results with this problem. Third, we develop a mathematical framework and a
methodology tailored to the investigation of this problem
Separation for dot-depth two
The dot-depth hierarchy of Brzozowski and Cohen classifies the star-free
languages of finite words. By a theorem of McNaughton and Papert, these are
also the first-order definable languages. The dot-depth rose to prominence
following the work of Thomas, who proved an exact correspondence with the
quantifier alternation hierarchy of first-order logic: each level in the
dot-depth hierarchy consists of all languages that can be defined with a
prescribed number of quantifier blocks. One of the most famous open problems in
automata theory is to settle whether the membership problem is decidable for
each level: is it possible to decide whether an input regular language belongs
to this level?
Despite a significant research effort, membership by itself has only been
solved for low levels. A recent breakthrough was achieved by replacing
membership with a more general problem: separation. Given two input languages,
one has to decide whether there exists a third language in the investigated
level containing the first language and disjoint from the second. The
motivation is that: (1) while more difficult, separation is more rewarding (2)
it provides a more convenient framework (3) all recent membership algorithms
are reductions to separation for lower levels.
We present a separation algorithm for dot-depth two. While this is our most
prominent application, our result is more general. We consider a family of
hierarchies that includes the dot-depth: concatenation hierarchies. They are
built via a generic construction process. One first chooses an initial class,
the basis, which is the lowest level in the hierarchy. Further levels are built
by applying generic operations. Our main theorem states that for any
concatenation hierarchy whose basis is finite, separation is decidable for
level one. In the special case of the dot-depth, this can be lifted to level
two using previously known results
Covering and separation for logical fragments with modular predicates
For every class of word languages, one may associate a decision
problem called -separation. Given two regular languages, it asks
whether there exists a third language in containing the first
language, while being disjoint from the second one. Usually, finding an
algorithm deciding -separation yields a deep insight on
.
We consider classes defined by fragments of first-order logic. Given such a
fragment, one may often build a larger class by adding more predicates to its
signature. In the paper, we investigate the operation of enriching signatures
with modular predicates. Our main theorem is a generic transfer result for this
construction. Informally, we show that when a logical fragment is equipped with
a signature containing the successor predicate, separation for the stronger
logic enriched with modular predicates reduces to separation for the original
logic. This result actually applies to a more general decision problem, called
the covering problem
- …